Assessment in a
Constructivist, a Technology-Supported Learning
Abstraction
From the conversation we gather that some students:
·
Memorize very much for the test.
·
Study only for passing score and a passing grade.
The questions we raise are: “is it really bad to memorize for the test?”
and is it not good to study for a score and for a grade? The answer to both
questions is a NO .
Authentic assessment is most appropriate for the constructive classroom.
Authentic assessment measures collective abilities, written and oral expression
skills, analytical skills, manipulative skills, (like computer skills )
integration, creativity, and ability to work collaboratively.
In authentic assessment, students perform real world tasks, thus the word
“authentic” assessment includes performance or product assessment.
·
You and your students may develop a rubric. It can be a
collaborative effort for both of you- teacher and students- in line with the
practice of self-assessment, which is highly encourage. In fact with scoring
rubric, standards are clearly set at the beginning for you and your students.
·
Assessment in a technology-supported environment necessarily
includes display of skillful and creative use of technologies, old and recent,
because that is what is naturally expected of us in the real world, a
technology-dominated world.
·
In the 21 century, we need to be computer literate and fluent
or we get lost or become helpless.
·
These presentations need performance-based assessment or
product assessment. It is a direct assessment.
·
We do not test their computer and creative skills, their
analytical and integrative skills by way of a multiple-choice.
·
A technology-supported
classroom maximizes the use of old and new technology, students are expected to
demonstrate learning with the use of both old and new technology.
·
Students may use transparencies OHP to demonstrate the
learned skill of topic presentation.
This
is process or performance assessment. How do we assess of our students have
learned the constructivist’s way of thinking, behaving and living? The rubric
for understanding and improving meaningful environments.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento